Comments on: JStORM: A New JavaScript Object-Relational Mapper

By: Urielka

Urielka — Sat, 13 Sep 2008 12:54:56 +0000

Yeha,docs are coming in,also i am going to write some wiki pages to explain how to implement providers since many people are interested in this.

By: ThomasHansen

ThomasHansen — Sat, 13 Sep 2008 07:09:13 +0000

Interesting and probably great work, though I still don’t understand why so few understand that moving from n’tier to n*n’tier is a bad thing … (PS!
I am not against Ajax, though I am for server-side binded Ajax libraries)

By: morphine

morphine — Sat, 13 Sep 2008 01:43:04 +0000

Hello, I just signal a similar project (syntax a little shorter) :
http://morphinedb.googlecode.com/

By: ragjunk

ragjunk — Sat, 13 Sep 2008 00:13:08 +0000

Of all types of ORM products, I liked db4o the best for its simplicity. It is a Java-based product, but I am siting it as an example for its simple syntax and usage.

http://developer.db4o.com/Resources/view.aspx/Formula_One_Tutorial

Most ORM products are too intrusive or want us to learn new syntaxes, so they are not easily replaceable.

Cheers,
Rags.

PS: I don’t work for db4o, nor have any other interest in db4o.

By: ThomasHansen

ThomasHansen — Fri, 12 Sep 2008 22:52:30 +0000

@ragjunk
db4o is first of all also a product for .Net and Mono, second of all (and more importantly) it is not an ORM tool but an OO database which is quite a difference … I don’t work for them either BTW…